[Fail2ban-users] banaction = firewallcmd-rich-rules ?

[lejeczek <pe...@ya...>]

Hi guys.

With banaction as above my _fail2ban_ inject rules into 
_default_ zone - is this by design or I misconfigured my setup?
The way _fail2ban_ does it for me seems to me, is broken, 
defeats the purpose - no?
_zone_ when in use will(should) use a given iface(s) - in my 
case it's a zone with one specific, public-facing interface, 
which zone is not "default" zone so... what _fail2ban_ does 
is, well.. useless.
This must not be a bug ? what am I missing in terms of config?

I'm on Centos 9 with ver. 1.3.4

many thanks, L.