Re: Optional message handling

[Alexey Z. <in...@in...>]

I was thinking about such function during the last week. It would be
useful for the startup-verifier, I was mentioning to you verbally.

But in my case, I, actually, found an even better solution, which
doesn't require parabellym modification.

So, theoretically, such functionality could be useful, but I don't like
the possibility of hijacking, just as you..

On the other hand, parabellym is vulnerable to hijacking already, as
there is no "official way" to identify the recipient. Parabellym,
currently, is the system, where _anyone_ can give any command to the
unknown _someone_. It's just the question of knowing the correct
command, and being lucky to be the first subscriber.