Hello,
first of all I'd like to thank you four your incredible job of keeping alive this useful app.
I just did the update of FaceTracknoir from version 1.8 alpha to the recent 2.00. I use Point Track v1.1 with my PS3 Eye at Resolution of 320x240 and protocol freetrack 2.1.
I notice that from version 2.00 the point tracker "Sleep Time" setting no longer affect the webcam FPS. You can change its value from 1 to 1000 without any effect on the FPS count. In addition with PS3-Eye the FPS count can't go over 91 and with version 1.8 alpha I could reach also 190FPS.
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
You are right: the sleep time has no effect any more. I have changed the polling-cycle of PointTacker, so that in runs "in pace" with the main cycle (of 100 fps). Polling faster than that should have no effect, since it only resulted in frames being skipped.
Some user(s) say that it does affect tracking, but that may be just "a feeling" IMO
If you would like to refer to this comment somewhere else in this project, copy and paste the following link:
Hello,
first of all I'd like to thank you four your incredible job of keeping alive this useful app.
I just did the update of FaceTracknoir from version 1.8 alpha to the recent 2.00. I use Point Track v1.1 with my PS3 Eye at Resolution of 320x240 and protocol freetrack 2.1.
I notice that from version 2.00 the point tracker "Sleep Time" setting no longer affect the webcam FPS. You can change its value from 1 to 1000 without any effect on the FPS count. In addition with PS3-Eye the FPS count can't go over 91 and with version 1.8 alpha I could reach also 190FPS.
Hi Eagle,
You are right: the sleep time has no effect any more. I have changed the polling-cycle of PointTacker, so that in runs "in pace" with the main cycle (of 100 fps). Polling faster than that should have no effect, since it only resulted in frames being skipped.
Some user(s) say that it does affect tracking, but that may be just "a feeling" IMO