Re: [F-Script-talk] newbie questions
Brought to you by:
pmougin
From: Philippe M. <phi...@wa...> - 2006-06-20 14:07:53
|
> But is there a reason that the KVC for the variable names > and references to super could not be easily done in the compiler? No. It's just that it is not implemented yet. > Each F-Script class could have a base class, either an objective-C > class or a previously defined Smalltalk class and two additional > dictionaries for added member variables and methods. If you then hook > into the compiler, KVC for the variables could be done automatically > and super would be available as well. The compiler would just have to > distinguish if it is still at the Smalltalk layer for resolving > symbols or already at the boundary to Objective-C. > Does that make sense? Yes. However, given that the Objective-C runtime offers support for dynamically creating classes (with instance variables), adding methods and so on, I think it would be better to use it directly. Philippe |