Re: [F-Script-talk] [ANN] F-Script 1.3.1 Release Candidate

[Ken F. <ken...@gm...>]

On 1/29/06, Todd Blanchard <tbl...@ma...> wrote:
> It is possible to say 'anObject setFoo: aValue' and 'anObject foo' to
> an NSManagedObject if the object's entity has property
> 'foo' (basically it maps setFoo: to setValue: forKey:'foo' and foo to
> valueForKey:'foo'

So is there any reason we're only doing this for NSManagedObjects?  Is
it too evil to want to get at normal object ivars in this way as well?
:-)

I usually use FScript for exploration and debugging, so I'm generally
not too concerned with encapsulation.

The release candidate is working great for me so far!

-Ken