[F-Script-talk] Re: F-Script compatibility problems

[Philippe M. <pm...@ac...>]

Yes it's not a perfect solution. On the other hand, renaming these=20
methods would probably not be a good thing because those are the=20
standards method names for booleans in the Smalltalk world, and we want=20=

F-Script to be a Smalltalk dialect.

Best,

Phil

Le mardi, 31 d=E9c 2002, =E0 22:13 Europe/Paris, Pierre Thibault a =E9crit=
 :

> Ok,
>
> I think this is a good solution for me. But it is not a perfect=20
> solution. What about other compilers? And what about people using=20
> these operators? As I know, almost no one is using them. So it is not=20=

> perfect but if no one is having a problem with that I'll say that this=20=

> a temporary solution.
>
> This trick should be mention in EmbeddingFScriptIntoCocoa.pdf I think.
>
> Thank you Phil.
>
> Le mardi, 31 d=E9c 2002, =E0 13:05 America/Montreal, Philippe Mougin a=20=

> =E9crit :
>
>> Hi Pierre,
>>
>> You should use the Objective-C++ compiler option=20
>> "-fno-operator-names". This will allow you to compile these methods.
>>
>>
>
> ----------------------
> Pierre
>
>
>
> -------------------------------------------------------
> This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
> Welcome to geek heaven.
> http://thinkgeek.com/sf
> _______________________________________________
> F-Script-talk mailing list
> F-S...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/f-script-talk
>