Re: [ext2resize] [PATCH] fix i_file_acl handling
Status: Inactive
Brought to you by:
adilger
From: Petter R. <pe...@hu...> - 2006-06-11 09:07:28
|
[Andreas Dilger] > This patch fixes handling of the EXT2_FEATURE_COMPAT_EA feature. > The block referenced by i_file_acl needs to be checked for remapping > during filesystem preparation/resize. Patch is proof of concept > only, it has not been tested. It fail to build with this error when I apply it to the current CVS: ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `doblock': ext2_block_relocator.c:142: warning: unused parameter `fs' ext2_block_relocator.c:267:74: macro "offsetof" passed 3 arguments, but takes just 2 ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `doinode': ext2_block_relocator.c:266: error: `offsetof' undeclared (first use in this function) ext2_block_relocator.c:266: error: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once ext2_block_relocator.c:266: error: for each function it appears in.) ext2_block_relocator.c:266: error: too few arguments to function `doblock' ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `inode_block_scan': ext2_block_relocator.c:327: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `ext2_block_relocator_grab_blocks': ext2_block_relocator.c:524: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `ext2_block_relocate_grow': ext2_block_relocator.c:688: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:691: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c: In function `ext2_block_relocate_shrink': ext2_block_relocator.c:869: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:879: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:879: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:880: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:886: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned ext2_block_relocator.c:896: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned I guess this patch need more work too. :) Friendly, -- Petter Reinholdtsen |