Re: [ext2resize] [PATCH] More endian-fixes (from fedora patch)

[Andreas D. <ad...@cl...>]

On Jun 10, 2006  08:11 +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> The change to ext2_fs.h seem to be mostly irrelevant, just document
> more of the blocks content.  The rest look relevant to this change.
> Should I commit the changes to the ext2_super_block struct, or just
> drop that part?

You may as well keep this part.

> +#define LINUX_S_IFMT	00170000
> +#define LINUX_S_IFLNK	00120000
> +#define LINUX_S_ISLNK(m)	(((m) & LINUX_S_IFMT) == LINUX_S_IFLNK)

This should go into a header.

The rest seems reasonable, though I also have no way to test it.

Can you please set up cvs update email so that interested parties can
see the checkins being made.

Cheers, Andreas
--
Andreas Dilger
Principal Software Engineer
Cluster File Systems, Inc.