[exprla-devel] RE: [XPL] Licenses....

[reid_spencer <ras...@re...>]

--- In xpl-dev@y..., "Richard Anthony Hein" <935551@i...> wrote:
Michael,
If I knew more about what each one of the licenses entailed, I would 
give
some input.  At this point all I can say is that GPL is a pretty 
standard
license for opensource offerings.  I don't know what the others 
entail.  GPL
is what Linux uses, and they have updates centralized as you 
mentioned.  It
seems to work well.  That's all I have to say about it now.  How 
about a
list of pros/cons?

Richard A. Hein
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Michael Lauzon [mailto:ce940@f...]
  Sent: June 26, 2000 11:55 AM
  To: xpl@e...
  Subject: [XPL] Licenses....


  I don't think it's to early in the game to bring up the topic of 
what
  license we're going to use as what we are creating is open-source 
and
  will be freeware, but I see three choices:

  1. GPL

  2. LGPL

  3. MPL

  There may be more.  Though I still stick to the idea when we get 
this
  fully working, any updates to the code or tags, we have to be sent
  the
  new code, just like they do with Linux.

  Michael


----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--



----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--
  To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
  xpl-unsubscribe@o...
--- End forwarded message ---