[exprla-devel] Re: [xpl] The gist of it...
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
xpl2
From: reid_spencer <ras...@re...> - 2002-01-31 08:13:30
|
--- In xpl-dev@y..., Michael Lauzon <ce940@f...> wrote: Yes, Aly, we have a website...on Tripod (http://expel2.tripod.com/); but I am trying to get our group a free homepage on Linux Start (http://www.linuxstart.com/); though I wonder how we can go about getting a page on Source Forge (http://www.sourceforge.net/). Johnathan is using: <comment>This is a comment</comment> instead of: <!-- This is a comment --> Because comment between angle brackets is how we are going to be commenting XPL. :) On Thu, 11 May 2000, Robert A Hopkins wrote: > Are we doing a wish list as a new mailing list as a convenient way to > index items? I think it's a lot of work to plough through email archives, > and I don't see how there's enough volume on this list to justify > splitting it. What I had in mind was more like a simple html page with > literally a list of ideas, and a link or two if anyone wants to provide > more information. Is this do-able? Maintainable? (I have mail lists > coming out of my ears.) Michael, do we have a web site? > > Jonathan (11 May): > "Would you like to see > the addition example re-expressed using simplifications like that?" > > I think the more we express & re-express this language that doesn't exist > yet, the more fluent we will become. (What does "<stdout>" mean? And > "<stdin>"?) (Jonathan, is there a reason you're using the form > "<comment></comment>" rather than "<!--comment here...-->"?) > > Jonathan: > <if> > <false> > <verify> > mylist > </verify> > </false> > > abort <comment> Handy things, macros. </comment> > </if> > > I like this. I think if I would argue for anything it would be for > rigorously applying one of the fundamental concepts of xml, and that is > of containment. Elements are containers into which you stick things. So > the "if" container (or "conditional" or > "what-the-heck-is-if-then-called-in-formal-logic" container holds a > container for the condition to be tested and a container for the action > to be taken. Everything else is an attribute.) > > Jonathan: > <comment> > Here we define a program variable to contain > a list of integers. > <comment> > > <variable type=intList> > <name> > mylist > </name> > </variable> > > <comment> > > Somehow I'm not comfortable with the idea of a container called > "variable". How about "<xpl:variable-type name=intList>" > > As for the substance of what you're saying, I'm still working on it. As I > understand it, the gist of it is that you want to define a complex data > type in a DTD rather than in some sort of TYPE statement. (With namespace > we can link your variable to a different DTD. Name it something on the > order of "int:intlist", then it or any int:variable would belong to a > different namespace and different DTD than the default xmlns:xpl (it would > be linked to xmlns:int). That obviates my previous suggestion of > "xpl:variable-type".) > > ps: Oh my! I just saw what eGroups does to angle brackets in the > archives! ("View source" works.) > > pps: Don't be alarmed, Jonathan, I'm still working on the (larger) gist of > it. > > * * * * * * * * * * * * * > * ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( * > * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * > * ( ( ( A l y H o p k i n s ( ( ( * > * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * > * ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( ( * > * ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) * > * * * * * * * * * * * * * > > > > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > Remember four years of good friends, bad clothes, explosive chemistry > experiments. > http://click.egroups.com/1/4051/1/_/809694/_/958099969/ > -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---- > > To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: > xpl-unsubscribe@o... > > > > Michael http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Way/9180/ 'Eat, drink, and be merry, for tomorrow you may work.' --- End forwarded message --- |