[exprla-devel] Re: [xpl] FAQs for comment
Status: Pre-Alpha
Brought to you by:
xpl2
From: reid_spencer <ras...@re...> - 2002-01-31 08:05:36
|
--- In xpl-dev@y..., "Michael Lauzon" <ce940@f...> wrote: I don't think there is, but it being obscure shouldn't matter. I'll do a search on one of the search engines and see if you're right about the name, but XPL is what this language is going to be called, so if we upset the Pascal camp, well...we'll come to that if it happens. :) Well, maybe if one of us could contact the owner of XPL.ORG (do a whois from one of the registars' websites; I would but I haven't been able to access my email for over a week) and see if he/she would give it to us. --- In xpl@e..., "Garreth Galligan" <garreth.galligan@o...> wrote: > Michael Lauzon wrote: > > >we do have a problem: xpl.com, xpl.org (I do tend to lean more towards > >this one!), xpl.net, expel.com, expel.org, expel.net; they all happen > >to be taken, > > We could follow oasis' lead and use: > > xpl-open.org > or > open-xpl.org > > as it is an open source project. > > However I believe there is a very obscure language already in existence with > the acronym XPL - > Some flavour of Pascal I think, I could find virtually nothing on it. We > could be facing a naming conflict... --- End forwarded message --- |