--- In xpl-dev@y..., "Richard Anthony Hein" <935551@i...> wrote:
Michael,
If I knew more about what each one of the licenses entailed, I would
give
some input. At this point all I can say is that GPL is a pretty
standard
license for opensource offerings. I don't know what the others
entail. GPL
is what Linux uses, and they have updates centralized as you
mentioned. It
seems to work well. That's all I have to say about it now. How
about a
list of pros/cons?
Richard A. Hein
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Lauzon [mailto:ce940@f...]
Sent: June 26, 2000 11:55 AM
To: xpl@e...
Subject: [XPL] Licenses....
I don't think it's to early in the game to bring up the topic of
what
license we're going to use as what we are creating is open-source
and
will be freeware, but I see three choices:
1. GPL
2. LGPL
3. MPL
There may be more. Though I still stick to the idea when we get
this
fully working, any updates to the code or tags, we have to be sent
the
new code, just like they do with Linux.
Michael
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--
----------------------------------------------------------------------
------
--
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
xpl-unsubscribe@o...
--- End forwarded message ---
|
