From: Alasdair D. <ala...@gm...> - 2021-02-17 21:38:48
|
Hi Andreas, As Wolfgang said, range:match will work.I use them in one of my functions, and it works really well and it is quick. Alasdair On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:35 PM Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...> wrote: > Dear Andreas, > > > Now, reading up on the ("new") range index, the page > https://exist-db.org/exist/apps/doc/newrangeindex says "fn:matches is > currently not supported due to limitations in Lucene's regular expression > handling. If you require fn:matches a lot, consider using the old range > index." Is this still the case? > > Yes, but you could try the special function range:matches instead of > fn:matches and see if it works for you. It supports only a subset, but in > your case, this might be sufficient? > > Best, > > Wolfgang > > _______________________________________________ > Exist-open mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open > |