|
From: Alasdair D. <ala...@gm...> - 2021-02-17 21:38:48
|
Hi Andreas,
As Wolfgang said, range:match will work.I use them in one of my functions,
and it works really well and it is quick.
Alasdair
On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 9:35 PM Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...>
wrote:
> Dear Andreas,
>
> > Now, reading up on the ("new") range index, the page
> https://exist-db.org/exist/apps/doc/newrangeindex says "fn:matches is
> currently not supported due to limitations in Lucene's regular expression
> handling. If you require fn:matches a lot, consider using the old range
> index." Is this still the case?
>
> Yes, but you could try the special function range:matches instead of
> fn:matches and see if it works for you. It supports only a subset, but in
> your case, this might be sufficient?
>
> Best,
>
> Wolfgang
>
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-open mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open
>
|