From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2017-02-11 09:51:41
|
Also I just realised that the merge to `master` was not done for 3.0 release... On 11 February 2017 at 09:51, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote: >> *almost* all users will use the dmg or jar, so issue will be reported with >> the correct information. others will run from ‘develop’ which contains the >> correct information as well. So here is not a real issue. > > DMG and Jar must have been built from 3.0 tag in Git... so it has the > same problem!!! > > >> About the pulled-in PR: these are ONLY github templates, which *by >> definition* must be in *develop*; so also here there is not a real an >> serious issue (certainly if you see things from a pragmatic point of viewe) > > The problem is that this adds non-critical changes to 3.0.1 which > increases the risk in 3.0.1 and also muddies the history. > > > > -- > Adam Retter > > eXist Developer > { United Kingdom } > ad...@ex... > irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |