Re: [Exist-development] illegal XmldbURI?

[Hungerburg <pc...@my...>]

Am 2015-07-04 um 10:59 schrieb Dmitriy Shabanov:
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2015 at 11:28 AM, Hungerburg <pc...@my...
>
>     > XmldbURI uri = XmldbURI.create("/db/xmldb:something #1.dita");
>
>     Regarding RFC 3986, that looks to me like a *decoded* path component
>     with two segments ("db", "xmldb:something ") and a fragment ("1.dita")
>     too; if it should be a path only, the crosshatch would have to be remain
>     quoted even after decoding.
>
> In case of RFC 3986 here is "/db/xmldb" scheme, "something " hier-part
> and "1.dita" fragment. https://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc3986.txt section 3.

That is exactly why I think that its a pain to pass URIs around as 
strings. When intelligent people cannot come to a conclusion, how should 
a computer do?

BTW: A scheme must not have a slash, at least not on the WWW:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc3986#section-3.1

> And that mean that most of dbs have illegal resource name.
>
> Encoding may help, but should XmldbURI follow RFC 3986?

You can treat it the same as any other URI then?

-- 
Peter