Re: [Exist-development] The syntax highlighting in oXygen 17 fails with eXist-db Update Extension

[Loren C. <lor...@gm...>]

It was handling it until the release of 17

Sent from my iPhone

On May 13, 2015, at 10:53 AM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...> wrote:

You mean oXygen's highlighting of eXist's XQuery Update syntax?  Yes, that will be true as long as eXist doesn't match the spec.  I wouldn't expect oXygen to add special handling for eXist, though I certainly wouldn't object to it!

> On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:33 AM, Loren Cahlander <lor...@gm...> wrote:
> I thought so.  The syntax highlighting for XQuery update in oXygen 17 is broken.
> 
> 
> 
> Sent from my iPad
> 
> On May 13, 2015, at 9:53 AM, wol...@gm... wrote:
> 
>>> Does eXist-db 2.2 support the XQuery 3.0 update syntax? Http://w3.org/TR/xquery-update-30
>> 
>> No, the xquery update features in eXist differ not only syntactically, but also conceptually from the W3C specification, which was published quite some time after eXist introduced the feature. We did not try to align the syntax as that would be confusing, but intentionally left it non-standard.
>> 
>> Wolfgang
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> One dashboard for servers and applications across Physical-Virtual-Cloud
> Widest out-of-the-box monitoring support with 50+ applications
> Performance metrics, stats and reports that give you Actionable Insights
> Deep dive visibility with transaction tracing using APM Insight.
> http://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/290420510;117567292;y
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-development mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development