Re: [Exist-development] [Exist-commits] SF.net SVN: exist:[18240] stable/eXist-2.0.x/tools/jetty/ etc/standalone/WEB-INF

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

I rely on standalone please keep
On 6 Feb 2013 18:18, "Joe Wicentowski" <jo...@gm...> wrote:

> Thanks for this info, Wolfgang.  Perhaps others who rely on the
> standalone should weigh in, since I don't use the standalone
> configuration.  But from my perspective, if it lowers the support
> footprint, it'd be good to eliminate a configuration that doesn't
> offer anything unique over the default configuration.
>
> Joe
>
> On Wed, Feb 6, 2013 at 10:41 AM, Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...>
> wrote:
> > Hi Joe,
> >
> > the standalone server is now just a different jetty/web.xml
> configuration. Previously the main difference was that standalone did not
> configure webapp as root context (and that's still the case), but since we
> moved nearly everything out of webapp, the two configurations are now very
> similar and you could easily adapt the standard configuration yourself to
> match the standard one.
> >
> > Wolfgang
> >
> >> HI Wolfgang,
> >>
> >> > Revision: 18240
> >> > http://sourceforge.net/p/exist/code/18240
> >> > Author: wolfgang_m
> >> > Date: 2013-02-06 14:54:51 +0000 (Wed, 06 Feb 2013)
> >> > Log Message:
> >> > -----------
> >> > [ignore] Get standalone server to work again. But do we want to keep
> this configuration at all? It is no longer much different from the standard
> deployment.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> What are the differences now? I'm always in favor of consolidation /
> >> simplification.
> >>
> >> Joe
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Free Next-Gen Firewall Hardware Offer
> Buy your Sophos next-gen firewall before the end March 2013
> and get the hardware for free! Learn more.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sophos-d2d-feb
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-development mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development
>