From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2012-12-02 21:59:18
|
> Aahhh, right, I did not think about the deprecation possibility. Hmmmm > there is one serious issue however, the default 'prefix' "math" is now used > by the 'official' namespace, that would cause a problem anyway? I > relabelled it to "math-ext". > You dont need to change the prefix. The prefix is opaque, its the namespace that matters. That said it doesnt matter if you change the prefix because it is opaque. > > hmmmm I deleted the double functions already, well I can revert it if we > want to. > I think we must. > Can we think of a smart design where the old extension uses code from the > new function library? The ultimate goal is not to have double code (I'd > rather avoid that, politely said) > Sure, bring the math module into the core code-base rather than as external and then abstract the core code into business logic classes and call from both function wrappers. Or only move the now W3C common code into the core, abstract it still and then have the math module call it. > > cheers > Cheers :-p > > Dannes > > eXist-db Native XML Database > http://www.exist-db.org > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |