Re: [Exist-development] [Exist-commits] SF.net SVN: exist:[15778] trunk/eXist/src/org/exist/security/internal/ SecurityManagerImpl.java

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

But why do they need sessions? Why can't they just he static objects?
On Feb 2, 2012 5:09 AM, "Dmitriy Shabanov" <sha...@gm...> wrote:

> That's for two build-in accounts: SYSTEM & GUEST.
>
> I can't say that I'm very happy, but previous design was ever worse.
> Create new object each time SYSTEM or GUEST account required is
> unnecessary waste of resources (memory), during single "external"
> operation that happen several time. I do believe that SYSTEM & GUEST can
> share one session object for all operations. (SYSTEM as minimum). Plus,
> this sessions should live forever.
>
> On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:40 AM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote:
>
>> I really feel that session management should NOT be in the
>> SecurityManager - concerns are being muddied. The SessionManager
>> should be a seperate layer above and subject to the SecurityManager.
>>
>
> --
> Dmitriy Shabanov
>