From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-10-20 17:18:24
|
see it in context.... On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote: > On 20 October 2011 02:55, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Dannes Wessels <di...@ex...> > > wrote: > >> > >> I am on the maven side, I am convinced in the Prague days. I'll always > be > >> healthy critical though on all used tooling, maven in special because > there > >> are too many fanboys that think maven is the golden tool. > >> > >> At the moment we switch to maven, we need to re-do lots of logic we have > >> coded in ant right now. Maven does not provide all we need :) *think of > file > >> processing, rewriting*. And.... The current layout with conf.XML does > not > >> really map on the maven structure..... > > > > file processing, rewriting - pluggins??? > > Its hard or impossible to understand what you are talking about from > just those few words. Please elaborate? > -- Dmitriy Shabanov |