From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-10-20 12:44:39
|
On 20 October 2011 02:55, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Dannes Wessels <di...@ex...> > wrote: >> >> I am on the maven side, I am convinced in the Prague days. I'll always be >> healthy critical though on all used tooling, maven in special because there >> are too many fanboys that think maven is the golden tool. >> >> At the moment we switch to maven, we need to re-do lots of logic we have >> coded in ant right now. Maven does not provide all we need :) think of file >> processing, rewriting. And.... The current layout with conf.XML does not >> really map on the maven structure..... > > -1 : configuration is standardized staff > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html You dont have to use the standard directory layout, you can use any layout you want. However I think it would be good to use the standard directory layout as this adopted widely even in situations where the projects are not maven based. In fact switching eXist to a standard directory layout is very very easy, I have done it here. > > file processing, rewriting - pluggins??? Its hard or impossible to understand what you are talking about from just those few words. Please elaborate? > -- > Dmitriy Shabanov > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |