From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-10-20 09:25:35
|
On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 1:19 PM, Dannes Wessels <di...@ex...> wrote: > On 20 okt. 2011, at 03:55, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Dannes Wessels <di...@ex...>wrote: > >> >> I am on the maven side, I am convinced in the Prague days. I'll always be >> healthy critical though on all used tooling, maven in special because there >> are too many fanboys that think maven is the golden tool. >> >> At the moment we switch to maven, we need to re-do lots of logic we have >> coded in ant right now. Maven does not provide all we need :) think of file >> processing, rewriting. And.... The current layout with conf.XML does not >> really map on the maven structure..... >> > > -1 : configuration is standardized staff > > > I need to be convinced for this.... > Well, several solution: I do like one - move conf.xml to parent folder of data one. > file processing, rewriting - pluggins??? > > > Jups, this implies lots of work, unless proven differently. We can't > underestimate this amount of work.... > > agree... -- Dmitriy Shabanov |