From: Dannes W. <di...@ex...> - 2011-10-20 08:18:33
|
On 20 okt. 2011, at 03:55, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 12:55 AM, Dannes Wessels <di...@ex...> wrote: > > I am on the maven side, I am convinced in the Prague days. I'll always be healthy critical though on all used tooling, maven in special because there are too many fanboys that think maven is the golden tool. > > At the moment we switch to maven, we need to re-do lots of logic we have coded in ant right now. Maven does not provide all we need :) think of file processing, rewriting. And.... The current layout with conf.XML does not really map on the maven structure..... > > -1 : configuration is standardized staff I need to be convinced for this.... > http://maven.apache.org/guides/introduction/introduction-to-the-standard-directory-layout.html hmmm rather unclear and ambiguous piece of text. > file processing, rewriting - pluggins??? Jups, this implies lots of work, unless proven differently. We can't underestimate this amount of work.... D. |