From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-10-18 11:08:47
|
On Oct 18, 2011 10:56 AM, "Dmitriy Shabanov" <sha...@gm...> wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:52 PM, Wolfgang Meier <wol...@ex...> wrote: >> >> > for xml resource it should be 'rwu', for binary & collections (or only xquery scripts, not clear for me) 'rwx' >> >> No, I thought we would drop the update semantics altogether. "x" should always mean "execute", no matter if eXist knows how to execute a particular resource. >> >> > > Remove 'u' completely? Just checking to be sure, that's fine for me. This is already done in a branch here. I need to check in, but first I need to fix all the tests that relied on bad permissions. > -- > Dmitriy Shabanov > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > |