From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-10-18 09:43:03
|
On Oct 18, 2011 9:34 AM, "Chris Tomlinson" <chr...@gm...> wrote: > > Wolfgang, > > So "*w*" on a file, F will be sufficient to grant update and delete or will delete require "*w*" on the collection containing F? > Yes you will need write on the parent collection to delete a file. This is the Unix model. If its not implemented now, it will be when the changes are finished. > Is this change one that is pending for the 1.6 transition of trunk? > > Thank you, > Chris > > > > On Oct 18, 2011, at 1:37 PM, Wolfgang Meier wrote: > >> > for xml resource it should be 'rwu', for binary & collections (or only xquery scripts, not clear for me) 'rwx' >> >> No, I thought we would drop the update semantics altogether. "x" should always mean "execute", no matter if eXist knows how to execute a particular resource. >> >> Wolfgang > > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-oct > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > |