Re: [Exist-development] scheduler revision

[Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...>]

On Sun, Jul 3, 2011 at 9:28 PM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote:

> I am not against changes to the Scheduler, but what are the problems?
>
> I AM against converting anything to the new Configuration framework.
> IMHO it is a good first proof of concept but there is lots about it
> that needs revising, it feels like a mess at the moment.
>
>
Do you have any problem with configurator now? eXist itself looks like a
mess, so what? should we stop coding it?

-- 
Dmitriy Shabanov