Re: [Exist-development] scheduler revision

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

I am not against changes to the Scheduler, but what are the problems?

I AM against converting anything to the new Configuration framework.
IMHO it is a good first proof of concept but there is lots about it
that needs revising, it feels like a mess at the moment.

On 3 July 2011 17:58, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I do want to revisit scheduler to solve problems it have, same time I do
> want to move configurations to /db/system/scheduler/... and convert to new
> configuration framework.
> Any objections?
> --
> Dmitriy Shabanov
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> All of the data generated in your IT infrastructure is seriously valuable.
> Why? It contains a definitive record of application performance, security
> threats, fraudulent activity, and more. Splunk takes this data and makes
> sense of it. IT sense. And common sense.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2d-c2
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-development mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development
>
>



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
ad...@ex...
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb