Re: [Exist-development] Scheduler and new permissions model....

[Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...>]

On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 2:02 PM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote:

> > On Wed, Jun 15, 2011 at 3:54 AM, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote:
> >>
> >> >  Do we need to extend the conf.xml scheduler elements/definitions to
> be
> >> > able to specify what user
> >> > should be used to fire up a scheduled xquery, rather than the default
> >> > guest?
> >>
> >> Nope, I have laid the foundations for SetUID and SetGID style
> >> permissions, these will be implemented in the near future and will
> >> also solve this issue I hope.
> >>
> >
> > Yes, that's looks reasonable, the conf file can have scheduler definition
> > 'account' (attribute) as cron do have.
>
> No! It doesnt need that as you can just setUID on the XQuery file itself.
>

Think a bit more, linux like systems have setuid, but cron do have user
attribute ... why?

-- 
Dmitriy Shabanov