Re: [Exist-development] Testing betterFORM eXist integration.

[<ht...@ma...>]

Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> writes:

> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote:
>> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question
>> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-)
>> 
>> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy
>> for new users to get started with xforms.
>> 
>> Wolfgang
>
> Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk. 

I believe there's a bug in this release.

Have you tried xforms/hello.xml ?

Somewhat to my surprise, hello2.xml works, but hello.xml does not.

The problem is in betterform-Full.js, which hits a bug, which blows out the
initialisation, which means that the default path (betterform/Flux) is
never overriden, leading to a 404 on
/betterform/Flux/call/plaincall/Flux.dispatchEventType.dwr

To trigger this, I did svn update in the exist trunk, built exist and
confirmed that betterform was installed OK.  Because bf now gets all
its resources from inside its jar file, I can't easily debug further.

I do not have a completely vanilla web.xml, so it is possible there is
a confounding problem somewhere -- can anyone else reproduce,
i.e. does xforms/hello.xml work for you Tobias?

ht
-- 
		    Henry S. Thompson, Markup Systems Ltd.
               Cavers Garden Farm, Denholm; by Hawick; TD9 8LN
                            +44 (0) 7866 471 388
	       Fax: (44) 131 651-1426, e-mail: ht...@ma...
			URL: http://www.markup.co.uk/
[mail really from me _always_ has this .sig -- mail without it is forged spam]