Re: [Exist-open] Triggers in trunk (was: Unique identifier for any resource.)

[Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...>]

On Mon, 2010-11-22 at 17:30 +0000, Adam Retter wrote:
> > Evgeny give me the idea to call one of three function signatures:
> one
> > that already there, one with xs:document-node parameter, another one
> > "binary-document", but I still do not sure that it safe to provide
> > unsaved document for more updates. (BTW, it performance lost to
> provide
> > document parameter, because of base64 transformation).
> 
> I do not want to separate functions for binary and xml documents. Sure
> that issue with base64 is the same for all operations in eXist-db at
> the moment where streams could be used, I think the trick will be to
> reimplement Base64Value, so that it uses a lazily evaluated stream
> instead.

Different signatures will allow to do updates for xml documents.

-- 
Cheers,

Dmitriy Shabanov