From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2010-10-09 13:58:47
|
For sure I ran into a situation there was a null value involved. In all conditions the mimetype set must be the same as eg via the rest interface. Thee shall ignore the logging of the mimeutil framework, we'll not use it. It is just some logging, nothing special. If it disturbed you, we could mute the logging, but the log4j config file is already large.... Cheers Dannes Sent from my iPhone On 6 okt. 2010, at 21:03, Stefan Majewski <ste...@un...> wrote: > mhh, I assumed that the mime==null test is used such that you won't run into trouble if it were actually null. I don't know if that can happen, Dannes obviously thought it might be possible. In that case I think it is not sensible to call a function on mime (if it can be null). |