Re: [Exist-development] Proposal to change security design of groups

[Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...>]

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 12:36 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...>wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On 27 Sep 2010, at 15:43 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote:
>
> I did mail before, we must agree on terms we going to use. 'owner' is quite
> good, but limited. My offer: group's 'manager' (can change members list &
> permissions for group, it can be 2 different roles ) & 'member' (use group's
> permissions). It simple to see that there can be person that can manage, but
> have no access for resources.
>
>
> by any chance, what happens if a group is removed (having a unique internal
> id) and a new group is added? Will the same id be reused internally?
>
>
Current design: unique id to all groups.

Example:
 - add group 'A' (get id 1);
 - remove group 'A' (move group description file to 'removed' collection, if
I remember correct);
 - add group 'A' (get id 2);

-- 
Dmitriy Shabanov