Re: [Exist-development] Proposal to change security design of groups

[Dannes W. <da...@ex...>]

Hi,

On 27 Sep 2010, at 15:43 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote:

> I did mail before, we must agree on terms we going to use. 'owner' is quite good, but limited. My offer: group's 'manager' (can change members list & permissions for group, it can be 2 different roles ) & 'member' (use group's permissions). It simple to see that there can be person that can manage, but have no access for resources. 

by any chance, what happens if a group is removed (having a unique internal id) and a new group is added? Will the same id be reused internally?

Kind regards

Dannes

--
eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org
Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624