Re: [Exist-development] Proposal to change security design of groups

[Dannes W. <da...@ex...>]

On 27 Sep 2010, at 17:12 , Adam Retter wrote:

> I am not clear on why a group would have 'permissions'? Surely
> collections and resources have permissions in terms of owner and
> group, but not the group object itself.

Probably we want to have a look at the unix permissions model.....

Kind regards

Dannes

--
eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org
Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624