Re: [Exist-development] httpclient issues

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

webdavclient would seem appropriate

On 16 August 2010 20:05, Loren Cahlander <lor...@gm...> wrote:
> Hello Dannes,
>
> I will create a new function module in extensions.  Should I call it webdav or webdav-client?
>
> Loren
>
> On Aug 16, 2010, at 01:40 PM, Dannes Wessels wrote:
>
>> Hi Loren,
>>
>> On 16 Aug 2010, at 19:45 , Loren Cahlander wrote:
>>
>>> I could copy the code from the library and implement it myself, but I have a timeframe issue.  I can first implement webdav:proppatch() with the jar and then change over to our own code.  I just have to get something implemented this week.
>>
>> Ok, I was not aware of this constraint. Ok, let's do a phased implementation then. We need to consider, if only proppatch() would be in webdav:, that would not make sense. If we can put more functions (logically) into webdav: then that would have my preference. In the end.
>>
>> If we can isolate all webdav-functions into one function library, we can probably come away with adding another 3rd party library.....
>>
>> Kind regards
>>
>> Dannes
>>
>> --
>> eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org
>> Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by
>
> Make an app they can't live without
> Enter the BlackBerry Developer Challenge
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/RIM-dev2dev
> _______________________________________________
> Exist-development mailing list
> Exi...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development
>



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
ad...@ex...
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb