From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2010-07-29 08:10:50
|
Adam, I like the idea of metadata axis. Your proposal for name/value pairs is simple and it can accommodate most of variations we may need. 2010/7/28 Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> > > MarkLogic implementation is interesting and a good starting point, > but I guess it does not allow attaching binary contents as metadata, which > is a limitation. Some scenarios can be, for instance, a JPEG image stored in > eXist could have some metadata in XML describing its EXIF properties > > Accessing this metadata at the moment is possible via the image xquery > extension module. > Actually the the existing image module gives vary limited metadata: hight, width and image type. It will really love to have all EXIF properties of an image as searchable metadata fields. > > > , and binary metadata like a thumbnail, and SVG or XSL-FO documents could > also have as binary metadata a thumbnail. > > Well my proposal was to use the XQuery datatypes, so then the user could > set metadata to be base64binary data if desired. -- > Adam Retter > What will be the format of the metadata if we request all available pairs? May be an element with all metadata pairs as attributes. Thomas |