From: James F. <jam...@ex...> - 2010-07-28 17:52:20
|
2010/7/28 Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...>: > On Wed, 2010-07-28 at 19:31 +0200, José María Fernández González wrote: >> we can have a look at the different approaches on filesystems world. >> In Mac OS X HFS+ and Windows NTFS there is the concept of forks, like >> several named streams of bytes attached to a file. One of those named >> streams is the default one, i.e. the file content. On UNIX you have >> the extended file attributes concept >> (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extended_file_attributes), and it is a >> key/value model. > > +1 for two streams, it's looks very close to Adam's proposal. I think this is a cool thing, a few thoughts: * we should make it possible to make metadata show up as embedded explicit mixed content (attributes or elements?) with a document stored in the database if we need to serialize document. * there maybe versioning considerations to think through with metadata * I do feel that considering a new metadata axis is useful but we need to be careful e.g. is it being proposed that we will have a metadata namespace for this stuff my 2p/2e/2czk J |