Re: [Exist-development] a new experiment was ....Re: Renaming the "lib" extension

[Adam R. <ad...@ex...>]

I would definitely buy you a beer for doing that :-)

If you could slip a Sherlock Holmes style pipe into it, I might
stretch to two beers...

Hopefully we will here from Evgeny, we really need to but his
extensions stuff to bed.


On 25 March 2010 16:25, James Fuller <jam...@ex...> wrote:
> I have yet to hear from Evgeny if he wants to do it our not ... otherwise I
> will go ahead with XQuery unit testing then do an XProc session ... just
> have to decide if people would pay me money (or beer) to wear pajamas and a
> tie ;)
> J
>
> On 25 March 2010 17:09, Adam Retter <ad...@ex...> wrote:
>>
>> Some great observations about teleconferencing Jim :-)
>>
>> I look forward to this experiment, let me know when I can subscribe...
>>
>> On 24 March 2010 22:17, James Fuller <jam...@ex...> wrote:
>> > On 24 March 2010 22:59, Loren Cahlander <lor...@gm...>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> I agree that a monthly conference call would be a good thing.  We
>> >> should
>> >> try to agree on a week of the month and day of week, like the 2nd
>> >> Sunday of
>> >> the month.  We would have to come up with a time of day that we all can
>> >> reasonably attend.
>> >
>> > a few observations:
>> > a) in my experience they phone conferences can quickly become
>> > unsustainable,
>> > sorry to sound negative but what will happen is 1-2 teleconferences then
>> > chaotic oscillator effect with sum energy being used to organise greater
>> > then sum useful output ... the video broadcast ,means its 'opt in' by
>> > interested individuals, ensures that the individual broadcasting is
>> > prepared
>> > and there is just enough comms via IRC ... though I maybe wrong about
>> > all
>> > this ;)
>> > b) 'many to many' conversations over the fone can be just as tedious as
>> > long
>> > email threads, I would rather optimize a 'broadcast' and enable with
>> > background channel via irc ... though I am not against phone conferences
>> > but
>> > lets schedule them one at a time. So that being said, when would be good
>> > for
>> > the 'next' fone conference
>> > c) we could organize 'points on the horizons' for future face to faces
>> > as
>> > far in advance as possible ... so that being said, whens the next one ?
>> > so 3 easy questions:
>> >
>> > 1) When is a good time for a fone conference for everyone  ?
>> > 2)  When is likely face to face to happen and what continent ?
>> > 3) I am going ahead with experiment ... I will be asking Evgeny to
>> > broadcast
>> > with me and we will release time for this (sometime in the coming week
>> > or
>> > so) ... I will give an overview on 'XProc development in eXist' and
>> > maybe
>> > 'Unit Testing XQuery overview'.
>> > thx J
>> >
>> > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > Download Intel&#174; Parallel Studio Eval
>> > Try the new software tools for yourself. Speed compiling, find bugs
>> > proactively, and fine-tune applications for parallel performance.
>> > See why Intel Parallel Studio got high marks during beta.
>> > http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-sw-dev
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > Exist-development mailing list
>> > Exi...@li...
>> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development
>> >
>> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Adam Retter
>>
>> eXist Developer
>> { United Kingdom }
>> ad...@ex...
>> irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
>
>



-- 
Adam Retter

eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
ad...@ex...
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb