Re: [Exist-development] Renaming the "lib" extension

[Evgeny G. <gaz...@gm...>]

> Yes I would agree to that as well. It should only be DBA, for example
> what about my potentially proprietary extensions and libraries to
> eXist that are top secret that I keep in lib/endorsed and lib/user, I
> certainly dont want anyone gaining access to those files!
>
> As such if it does require DBA style security, then this module seems
> somewhat redundant as you could just use the file module!
>
lib functions haven't sense with DBA access  only,
possible use file module instead.

Suggest one more: add folder(s) for signed jars.
You sign then you share these jars, aren't you?

PS. And all tests (fluent) will be work as well too.

-----------
Evgeny