Re: [Exist-development] Renaming the "lib" extension

[Leif-Jöran O. <lj...@ex...>]

Den 2010-03-24 19:19, Wolfgang Meier skrev:
>> Which, if I undertand it correctly, also means one of its main
>> incentives is void. Making this more like a remove decision.
> 
> Well, as I understand it, Evgeny primarily needs the lib module for
> his gate extension.

Yes, but if I remember correctly the argument against simply using the
file module was dba only.