Re: [Exist-development] Renaming the "lib" extension

[Wolfgang M. <wol...@ex...>]

> Which, if I undertand it correctly, also means one of its main
> incentives is void. Making this more like a remove decision.

Well, as I understand it, Evgeny primarily needs the lib module for
his gate extension.

Evgeny, could you find a way to secure the lib module while keeping
the gate functionality (even though the latter is not directly related
to eXist, I see the benefits it will have as an example for users)?

Wolfgang