From: Evgeny G. <gaz...@gm...> - 2010-03-22 15:45:11
|
> > 2010/3/22 Leif-Jöran Olsson <lj...@ex...>: > > > Den 2010-03-22 15:20, Evgeny Gazdovsky skrev: > > >>> One more ;-) How about: "open-with-external"? > > >> think need accent not on "open" but on "directly edit and save" > > > > > > But where are the boundaries? The extension is not doing the editing > > > just managing fetching and then the storing after saving in an external > > > editor. I can imagine using it on any resource of any type. Why should > > > it be restricted to office-like documents if it is both xml and binary > > > resources you are managing? What does it look like then if not a remote > > > storage? > > > > > > Some more suggestions: > > grab-and-stash > > roundtrip > > espace (easy persistence catalogue) > > (x)pa ((xml) persistence api) > > remote-storage > > etc Yes, you right, extension id bridge between eXist (like a remote storage), browser and desktop. I'm emphasize to simplest way to find, edit, save XML or binaries docs for end user of IS. |