Re: [Exist-development] Licensing for XQuery grammar (ljo branch)

[Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...>]

On Wed, 2010-01-06 at 21:42 +0100, Leif-Jöran Olsson wrote:
> 3> Another option may be to ask the copyright holder(s) on the
> xqgrammar
> > software (Nikolay Ognyanov, et al.?) to release their code under a
> dual
> > license including LGPL 2.1.
> 
> We could always start with investigating 3 if noone objects.

I'm in contact with Nikolay Ognyanov & we did exchange some ideas. I do
believe that license will not be big issue (other world will be
resolved). All we need is tree parse to prove that it's right way.

By the way, I vote for LGPL v3, because we do have Apache License
Version 2.0 staff (example: commons-*.jar & so on).
 
-- 
Cheers,

Dmitriy Shabanov