From: <sju...@ko...> - 2006-02-02 08:11:09
|
Hello, Den 1. feb. 2006 kl. 17.07 skrev Adam Retter: > Im afraid this may be interpretted in a negative light although my > intention was to try and reassure you, so... No reason to apologize. I got a little impatient, having been biten by that bug for the last half year - so when I finally managed to create a reproducible test case for it, I probably got a little too excited, forgetting the complexities involved, and other tasks and duties of all the developers:-) Also knowing the shifting modes of Sourceforge, I wasn't sure the e- mail had actually reached the recipients, and just wanted to call some attention. > The project has an incredibly rapid speed of development which I have > yet to see in any other Open Source collaborative development I have > been involved in. The level of support these guys give cant be bought, > we have support contracts for several commercial proprietry pieces of > software and they dont even come close. I 100% agree. > I have nothing but praise for the project, the software and especially > the developers - I will take this opportunity also to say a big THANK > YOU to them :-) Many, many big thanks from me too! >> If you have knowledge of Java and the time, you could try to fix this >> yourself, Eclipse is the prefered development environment. Sorry, my knowledge of Java is way to shallow to do anything useful. > Im sorry to anyone I may have offended or if my message was > interpretted > in a different manner to the reasuring one I had intended. No offence taken! > Hope thats all level? Sure:-) I should apologize to the original poster, who's thread I hijacked for my own (albeit somewhat related) purpose. I can only hope that my bug has the same underlying cause, and that the test case provided will help the developers solve it, for the benefit of us both (and all):-/ Best regards, Sjur |