From: Chris Marasti-G. <cg...@rj...> - 2005-11-18 13:19:04
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: exi...@li...=20 > [mailto:exi...@li...] On Behalf Of=20 > Manuel Lautenschlager > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 4:29 AM > To: exi...@li... > Subject: [Exist-open] Re: AJAX-based XQuery Sandbox >=20 > Yeah, thats very cool. >=20 > I was also thinking about rewriting my xslts to produce an=20 > ajax website. I need it working with and without javascript.=20 > For this i would generate normal html links and change it to=20 > ajax links as soon as the page ist loaded. Why do this? <a href=3D"page?thing=3D2" onclick=3D"doAjax(2); return false;">thing = 2</a> > I wrote a javascript-dataloader in past, before ajax was popular. > To avoid defining the style of the data twice (javascript and=20 > html) i generated an empty html-piece of one result, that was=20 > repeated by the javascript after. > I will try it again, with the new ajax-library and rest -=20 > this sounds quite promising for me. The last try worked, but=20 > was too complicated and not nice to handle. >=20 > The new xquery-sandbox looks much more modern. >=20 > I hope the xquries (with update) will work stable in future -=20 > then i'm happy :) >=20 > manuel >=20 [snip] Chris |
From: Chris Marasti-G. <cg...@rj...> - 2005-11-28 13:01:23
|
> -----Original Message----- > From: exi...@li...=20 > [mailto:exi...@li...] On Behalf Of=20 > Manuel Lautenschlager > Sent: Friday, November 18, 2005 9:22 AM > To: exi...@li... > Subject: [Exist-open] Re: AJAX-based XQuery Sandbox >=20 >=20 > > Why do this? > >=20 > > <a href=3D"page?thing=3D2" onclick=3D"doAjax(2); return=20 > false;">thing 2</a> > >=20 >=20 > i haven't wrote that part yet, but your solution sound good.=20 > i don't want "page?thing=3D2" to be called, when javascript is active. >=20 The return false; in the onclick prevents the link from executing (providing there are no errors in the doAjax function) > >>I wrote a javascript-dataloader in past, before ajax was popular. > >>To avoid defining the style of the data twice (javascript and > >>html) i generated an empty html-piece of one result, that=20 > was repeated=20 > >>by the javascript after. > >>I will try it again, with the new ajax-library and rest -=20 > this sounds=20 > >>quite promising for me. The last try worked, but was too=20 > complicated=20 > >>and not nice to handle. > >> > >>The new xquery-sandbox looks much more modern. > >> > >>I hope the xquries (with update) will work stable in future=20 > - then i'm=20 > >>happy :) > >> > >>manuel > >> > >=20 > > [snip] > >=20 > > Chris > >=20 > >=20 > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get=20 > Certified Today=20 > > Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification=20 > Exam for All=20 > > Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: > > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id=16845&op=3Dclick >=20 >=20 >=20 > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: Splunk Inc. Do you grep=20 > through log files for problems? Stop! Download the new AJAX=20 > search engine that makes searching your log files as easy as=20 > surfing the web. DOWNLOAD SPLUNK! > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=3D7637&alloc_id=3D16865&op=3Dclick > _______________________________________________ > Exist-open mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open >=20 |
From: Manuel L. <ml...@li...> - 2005-11-18 14:26:35
|
> Why do this? > > <a href="page?thing=2" onclick="doAjax(2); return false;">thing 2</a> > i haven't wrote that part yet, but your solution sound good. i don't want "page?thing=2" to be called, when javascript is active. >>I wrote a javascript-dataloader in past, before ajax was popular. >>To avoid defining the style of the data twice (javascript and >>html) i generated an empty html-piece of one result, that was >>repeated by the javascript after. >>I will try it again, with the new ajax-library and rest - >>this sounds quite promising for me. The last try worked, but >>was too complicated and not nice to handle. >> >>The new xquery-sandbox looks much more modern. >> >>I hope the xquries (with update) will work stable in future - >>then i'm happy :) >> >>manuel >> > > [snip] > > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by the JBoss Inc. Get Certified Today > Register for a JBoss Training Course. Free Certification Exam > for All Training Attendees Through End of 2005. For more info visit: > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idv28&alloc_id845&op=click |