From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 17:25:31
|
That is fixed. It working, only small problem left is dynamic servlet creation (from configuration), few more lines. -- Cheers, Dmitriy Shabanov On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 22:23 +0200, Dannes Wessels wrote: > http://atomic.exist-db.org/blogs/dizzzz/Jetty5toJetty6 > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 13:26 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > > > Is it jetty-update? > > > > If you are interesting I can help you with jetty update. Please, > > commit > > changes you did made & current problems list or todo. > > > > -- > > Cheers, > > > > Dmitriy Shabanov > > > > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:09 +0200, Dannes Wessels wrote: > >> yes...... > >> > >> I got stuck on a level of redesign. I have pending work on my Laptop > >> which I could commit. > >> > >> The main issue is getting the alternative jetty mode working (port > >> 8088 mode in jetty). We have done too much customizations which > >> cannot > >> be ported at all..... > >> > >> so some redesign is needed there.... (i have a separate branche for > >> it) > >> > >> D. > >> > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Dmitriy Shabanov > >> <sha...@gm...> wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> I did see your jetty update several weeks ago. > >> And my question: Did you face any trouble with update up to > >> 6.1 > >> (jetty) ? |
From: Dannes W. <di...@ex...> - 2009-10-31 20:17:16
|
Dmitriy cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... cheers Dannes On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 6:25 PM, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...>wrote: > That is fixed. It working, only small problem left is dynamic servlet > creation (from configuration), few more lines. > > -- > Cheers, > > Dmitriy Shabanov > > On Tue, 2009-10-20 at 22:23 +0200, Dannes Wessels wrote: > > http://atomic.exist-db.org/blogs/dizzzz/Jetty5toJetty6 > > > > On 16 Oct 2009, at 13:26 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > > > > > Is it jetty-update? > > > > > > If you are interesting I can help you with jetty update. Please, > > > commit > > > changes you did made & current problems list or todo. > > > > > > -- > > > Cheers, > > > > > > Dmitriy Shabanov > > > > > > On Fri, 2009-10-16 at 13:09 +0200, Dannes Wessels wrote: > > >> yes...... > > >> > > >> I got stuck on a level of redesign. I have pending work on my Laptop > > >> which I could commit. > > >> > > >> The main issue is getting the alternative jetty mode working (port > > >> 8088 mode in jetty). We have done too much customizations which > > >> cannot > > >> be ported at all..... > > >> > > >> so some redesign is needed there.... (i have a separate branche for > > >> it) > > >> > > >> D. > > >> > > >> On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 12:51 PM, Dmitriy Shabanov > > >> <sha...@gm...> wrote: > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> I did see your jetty update several weeks ago. > > >> And my question: Did you face any trouble with update up to > > >> 6.1 > > >> (jetty) ? > > -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 20:19:34
|
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:11 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: > Dmitriy > > cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist > 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... the answer should be yes, servlet API same Do we need JSP? -- Cheers, Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Dannes W. <di...@ex...> - 2009-10-31 20:52:36
|
On 31 Oct 2009, at 21:19 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:11 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: >> Dmitriy >> >> cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist >> 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... > > the answer should be yes, servlet API same > > Do we need JSP? IMO..... no. we have some jsp code, but it is not really usable. we have xquery, right? Kind regards Dannes -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 20:51:20
|
On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:46 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: > On 31 Oct 2009, at 21:19 , Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > > > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:11 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: > >> Dmitriy > >> > >> cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist > >> 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... > > > > the answer should be yes, servlet API same > > > > Do we need JSP? > > IMO..... no. we have some jsp code, but it is not really usable. we > have xquery, right? +1 There are not much code. -- Cheers, Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 20:22:12
|
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 01:19 +0500, Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:11 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: > > Dmitriy > > > > cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist > > 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... Well, the problem I see is "Almost stable" http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Downloading+Jetty > the answer should be yes, servlet API same > > Do we need JSP? > -- Cheers, Dmitriy Shabanov |
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2009-10-31 20:27:40
|
On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 01:21 +0500, Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-01 at 01:19 +0500, Dmitriy Shabanov wrote: > > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 21:11 +0100, Dannes Wessels wrote: > > > Dmitriy > > > > > > cool..... that enables us to have the newest jetty (7???) in exist > > > 1.4.1 ; I read that performance is better..... > > Well, the problem I see is "Almost stable" > http://docs.codehaus.org/display/JETTY/Downloading+Jetty + http://wiki.eclipse.org/Jetty/Starting/Porting_to_Jetty_7 that mean a lot of refactoring (not much any way ;) > > the answer should be yes, servlet API same > > > > Do we need JSP? > > -- Cheers, Dmitriy Shabanov |