Menu
▾
▴
exist-development — eXist Developer's List
You can subscribe to this list here.
| 2009 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(85) |
Dec
(20) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 |
Jan
(47) |
Feb
(127) |
Mar
(268) |
Apr
(78) |
May
(47) |
Jun
(38) |
Jul
(131) |
Aug
(221) |
Sep
(187) |
Oct
(54) |
Nov
(111) |
Dec
(84) |
| 2011 |
Jan
(152) |
Feb
(106) |
Mar
(94) |
Apr
(90) |
May
(53) |
Jun
(20) |
Jul
(24) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(32) |
Oct
(70) |
Nov
(22) |
Dec
(15) |
| 2012 |
Jan
(33) |
Feb
(110) |
Mar
(24) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(11) |
Jun
(8) |
Jul
(12) |
Aug
(37) |
Sep
(39) |
Oct
(81) |
Nov
(38) |
Dec
(50) |
| 2013 |
Jan
(23) |
Feb
(53) |
Mar
(23) |
Apr
(5) |
May
(19) |
Jun
(16) |
Jul
(16) |
Aug
(9) |
Sep
(21) |
Oct
(1) |
Nov
(2) |
Dec
(8) |
| 2014 |
Jan
(16) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(27) |
Apr
(1) |
May
(10) |
Jun
(1) |
Jul
(4) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(19) |
Oct
(22) |
Nov
(4) |
Dec
(6) |
| 2015 |
Jan
(3) |
Feb
(6) |
Mar
(9) |
Apr
|
May
(11) |
Jun
(23) |
Jul
(14) |
Aug
(10) |
Sep
(10) |
Oct
(9) |
Nov
(18) |
Dec
(4) |
| 2016 |
Jan
(5) |
Feb
(5) |
Mar
|
Apr
(2) |
May
(15) |
Jun
(2) |
Jul
(8) |
Aug
(2) |
Sep
(6) |
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2017 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
(12) |
Mar
(22) |
Apr
(6) |
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
(1) |
Aug
(1) |
Sep
(5) |
Oct
(2) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2018 |
Jan
(2) |
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(5) |
Jul
(3) |
Aug
|
Sep
(7) |
Oct
(19) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2021 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
|
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
(1) |
Nov
|
Dec
|
| 2022 |
Jan
|
Feb
|
Mar
|
Apr
|
May
|
Jun
(3) |
Jul
|
Aug
|
Sep
|
Oct
|
Nov
|
Dec
|
|
From: Вячеслав С. <sch...@gm...> - 2011-04-04 10:46:47
|
probably not so bad idea to have Disk Memory Usage at System Status page 4 апреля 2011 г. 12:13 пользователь Вячеслав Седов <sch...@gm...> написал: > look like this error shown when disk drive is out of space and backup > is triggered from web-admin > > 4 апреля 2011 г. 11:01 пользователь Dannes Wessels > <da...@ex...> написал: >> offlist: >> >> if you want us to respond, please write some content in a mail. 2 lines, >> without context, without details, without any info..... how can you expect >> us to help you? That will prevent making you disappointed in us..... again >> >> my 2 cts >> >> D. >> >> >> 2011/4/4 Вячеслав Седов <sch...@gm...> >>> >>> but here no other processes in "View Running Jobs" tab >>> >>> and only reboot help >>> >>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix >>> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; >>> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and >>> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Exist-development mailing list >>> Exi...@li... >>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development >> >> >> >> -- >> eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org >> Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 >> > |
|
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-04-04 10:08:43
|
Forgot to mention: release 1.4.x On Mon, Apr 4, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > I just found out that response:stream-binary() does not set the content > type anymore. > -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
|
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-04-04 10:02:10
|
Hi, I just found out that response:stream-binary() does not set the content type anymore. e.g. response:stream-binary( compression:zip(xxxxx) , "application/zip", "filename.zip" ) yields into an xml content-type and not "application/zip". Anyone a clue when this has changed? URLrewriter update? betterFORM integration? cheers Dannes -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
|
From: Вячеслав С. <sch...@gm...> - 2011-04-04 08:13:37
|
look like this error shown when disk drive is out of space and backup is triggered from web-admin 4 апреля 2011 г. 11:01 пользователь Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> написал: > offlist: > > if you want us to respond, please write some content in a mail. 2 lines, > without context, without details, without any info..... how can you expect > us to help you? That will prevent making you disappointed in us..... again > > my 2 cts > > D. > > > 2011/4/4 Вячеслав Седов <sch...@gm...> >> >> but here no other processes in "View Running Jobs" tab >> >> and only reboot help >> >> >> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ >> Create and publish websites with WebMatrix >> Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; >> WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and >> publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf >> _______________________________________________ >> Exist-development mailing list >> Exi...@li... >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > > > -- > eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org > Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 > |
|
From: Вячеслав С. <sch...@gm...> - 2011-04-04 06:56:37
|
but here no other processes in "View Running Jobs" tab and only reboot help |
|
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-03-31 17:57:15
|
Hi, On Thu, Mar 31, 2011 at 7:21 PM, Pierrick Brihaye <pie...@fr...>wrote: > > It should be pretty straightforward to find where the problem is, > shouldn't it ? > > I checked it, but it is not that simple. a clean local build is just okay.... and the javax.xml.xquery classed did not change as well...... strange.... D. -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
|
From: Pierrick B. <pie...@fr...> - 2011-03-31 17:21:20
|
Hi, Le 31/03/2011 11:21, Tobi Krebs a écrit : > So far i haven´t been able to reproduce the compilation error. > > What i did so far is (all with Java 1.6 and ant 1.7.1) : > > 1. clean checkout of the stable branch > 2. ./build.sh clean clean-all rebuild > 3. ./build.sh test (Unit Test Results shows 100% success) > 4 ./build.sh installer (which produces an working installer) > > Do i have to enable extra modules to recreate the situation on TeamCity? Teamcity's messages are like this (http://serengeti.friprogramvarusyndikatet.se:8111/viewLog.html;jsessionid=B466E18C9E05E9491A6D0020606367CC?buildId=5436&tab=buildResultsDiv&buildTypeId=bt9) : # /home/ljo/filer/buildAgent-2/work/1.4.x/src/org/exist/xqj/XQConnection.java:34: org.exist.xqj.XQConnection is not abstract and does not override abstract method setStaticContext(javax.xml.xquery.XQStaticContext) in javax.xml.xquery.XQConnection # public class XQConnection implements javax.xml.xquery.XQConnection { or like this : # /home/ljo/filer/buildAgent-2/work/1.4.x/src/javax/xml/xquery/XQWarning.java:13: cannot find symbol # symbol : constructor XQException(java.lang.String,java.lang.Throwable,java.lang.String,javax.xml.xquery.XQWarning) # location: class javax.xml.xquery.XQException # super(message, cause, vendorcode, nextWarning); # ^ It should be pretty straightforward to find where the problem is, shouldn't it ? Cheers, p.b. |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-31 10:16:32
|
I dont think you need to do anything extra to reproduce this issue on TeamCity. I am will be away for a few days now, but when I return next week I will try and look into this then. So in the short term dont worry, and in the longer term perhaps remind me next week if I forget to look into it and nobody else has done this in my absence. Cheers Adam. On 31 March 2011 11:21, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote: > Hi all, > > i am still trying to figure out what went wrong with my commit to the stable > eXist branch. > > So far i haven´t been able to reproduce the compilation error. > > What i did so far is (all with Java 1.6 and ant 1.7.1) : > > 1. clean checkout of the stable branch > 2. ./build.sh clean clean-all rebuild > 3. ./build.sh test (Unit Test Results shows 100% success) > 4 ./build.sh installer (which produces an working installer) > > Do i have to enable extra modules to recreate the situation on TeamCity? > > Any Help is very much appreciated. > > Greets > > Tobi > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Create and publish websites with WebMatrix > Use the most popular FREE web apps or write code yourself; > WebMatrix provides all the features you need to develop and > publish your website. http://p.sf.net/sfu/ms-webmatrix-sf > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-31 09:21:36
|
Hi all, i am still trying to figure out what went wrong with my commit to the stable eXist branch. So far i haven´t been able to reproduce the compilation error. What i did so far is (all with Java 1.6 and ant 1.7.1) : 1. clean checkout of the stable branch 2. ./build.sh clean clean-all rebuild 3. ./build.sh test (Unit Test Results shows 100% success) 4 ./build.sh installer (which produces an working installer) Do i have to enable extra modules to recreate the situation on TeamCity? Any Help is very much appreciated. Greets Tobi |
|
From: Roy W. <gar...@ya...> - 2011-03-30 09:33:41
|
Wishing you every success with your new venture. I am certain you will do well. -- Roy On 24/03/2011 18:04, Adam Retter wrote: > Dear eXist-db users and developers, > > We would like to announce our company eXist Solutions. > > eXist Solutions GmbH has been founded by senior developers from > eXist-db, namely Wolfgang Meier, Adam Retter, Dannes Wessels and > Leif-Jöran Olsson. > > The purpose of eXist Solutions is to provide support to professional > organisations that are using eXist-db. A major aim of eXist Solutions > is to support the eXist-db Open Source project through contributing > resources back into the project, therefore ensuring its long term > growth. eXist Solutions is also committed to engaging eXist-db > developers for project work wherever possible, and has already > demonstrated such collaboration in the past months. If you are > interested, please register by contacting us directly. > > eXist-db is Open Source and will always remain so. eXist Solutions > does not develop or offer a proprietary version of eXist-db, rather we > provide professional services that complement eXist-db. > > eXist Solutions offers Consultancy, Training, Hosting and both > Production and Development Support. For more information please see > our website – http://www.existsolutions.com or contact us directly – > in...@ex... > > Thank You > |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 19:25:41
|
Thanks to everyone for their kind wishes :-) On 28 March 2011 00:08, Paolo Di Pietro <pdi...@di...> wrote: > Wolfgang, Adam, Dannes and Leif, > > my best wishes to all of you for your new adventure. > > Paolo > > > > -----Messaggio originale----- > Da: Adam Retter [mailto:ad...@ex...] > Inviato: giovedì 24 marzo 2011 19:04 > A: exi...@li...; eXist development > Oggetto: [Exist-open] [ANN] eXist Solutions for eXist-db > > Dear eXist-db users and developers, > > We would like to announce our company eXist Solutions. > > eXist Solutions GmbH has been founded by senior developers from eXist-db, namely Wolfgang Meier, Adam Retter, Dannes Wessels and Leif-Jöran Olsson. > > The purpose of eXist Solutions is to provide support to professional organisations that are using eXist-db. A major aim of eXist Solutions is to support the eXist-db Open Source project through contributing resources back into the project, therefore ensuring its long term growth. eXist Solutions is also committed to engaging eXist-db developers for project work wherever possible, and has already demonstrated such collaboration in the past months. If you are interested, please register by contacting us directly. > > eXist-db is Open Source and will always remain so. eXist Solutions does not develop or offer a proprietary version of eXist-db, rather we provide professional services that complement eXist-db. > > eXist Solutions offers Consultancy, Training, Hosting and both Production and Development Support. For more information please see our website – http://www.existsolutions.com or contact us directly – in...@ex... > > Thank You > > -- > Adam Retter > > eXist Developer > { United Kingdom } > ad...@ex... > irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-open mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-open > > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 18:28:12
|
Great Tobi, Thanks very much.
Do you want to post a quick message in a new clean thread also,
advertising this fact and maybe explaining how people could get
started quickly with their first XForm in eXist-db+betterForm?
On 29 March 2011 17:29, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote:
> On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote:
>> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question
>> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-)
>>
>> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy
>> for new users to get started with xforms.
>>
>> Wolfgang
>
> Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk.
>
> I enabled the extension per default and set the XFormsFilter so it will react
> on XForms served from the Database ("/rest/db/*").
>
> I hope that´s okay.
>
> If there are any problems concerning the extension feel free to contact us.
>
> Tobi
>
--
Adam Retter
eXist Developer
{ United Kingdom }
ad...@ex...
irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb
|
|
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 15:45:39
|
On 29 Mar 2011, at 17:31 , Thomas White wrote: > I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes" I'd like to approach things in a more positive way: enabled="yes" (or true) -- Dannes Wessels eXist-db Open Source Native XML Database e: da...@ex... w: http://www.exist-db.org |
|
From: Thomas W. <tho...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 15:31:52
|
I am in favour for adding attributes disabled="yes". I do not think we should compare how we do things manually (uncommenting blocks) with how we are going to work with the config files. It is more likely to set/remove the @disabled attribute using build scripts or some other tools. Thomas ------ Thomas White Mobile:+44 7711 922 966 Skype: thomaswhite gTalk: thomas.0007 http://www.linkedin.com/in/thomaswhite0007 http://www.facebook.com/thomas.0007 On 29 March 2011 16:10, Dmitriy Shabanov <sha...@gm...> wrote: > On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...>wrote: > >> On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...>wrote: >> >>> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >>> instead >>> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at >>> refactoring >>> > time. >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >>> >>> >> Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must >> be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both >> scenarios..... >> > > Attribute do not force you to do not use comments way :-) > > -- > Dmitriy Shabanov > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > |
|
From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-29 15:29:47
|
On Tuesday 29 March 2011 14:54:40 Wolfgang Meier wrote:
> > Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question
> > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-)
>
> I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy
> for new users to get started with xforms.
>
> Wolfgang
Okay i committed both version to stable and trunk.
I enabled the extension per default and set the XFormsFilter so it will react
on XForms served from the Database ("/rest/db/*").
I hope that´s okay.
If there are any problems concerning the extension feel free to contact us.
Tobi
|
|
From: Dmitriy S. <sha...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 15:10:21
|
On Tue, Mar 29, 2011 at 9:42 AM, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...>wrote: > >> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >> instead >> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring >> > time. >> >> +1 >> >> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >> >> > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must > be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both > scenarios..... > Attribute do not force you to do not use comments way :-) -- Dmitriy Shabanov |
|
From: Wolfgang M. <wol...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:54:42
|
> Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question > causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) I think it should be enabled by default. The goal is to make it easy for new users to get started with xforms. Wolfgang |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:50:49
|
On 29 March 2011 14:23, Tobi Krebs <tob...@be...> wrote: > On Monday 28 March 2011 22:10:57 Adam Retter wrote: >> You need to do both, and you also need to do a rebuild of the >> extension modules before starting exist up again, from $EXIST_HOME you >> can do ./build.sh extension-modules >> > Hi, > > i got it running now. > > Thanks again for the help. > > My current test results are : > > Junit: stable 100% and 1 fail in trunk (testRangeIndex3) which also seems to > occur without enabling the extensions. Indeed, that is the case. You can always check this quickly by using the Guest Login here (its the link below the login boxes) - http://serengeti.friprogramvarusyndikatet.se:8111/viewType.html?buildTypeId=bt2&tab=buildTypeStatusDiv > XQTS: stable and trunk 99.3% (Minimal Conformance). > > If it is okay with you i would commit our changes to subversion. Please do. > Should i use Joern´s credentials or can you provide another login for me? If you give me your Subversion username then I will add you as a committer. Credit where credit is due, right? > Last but not least: Should i leave the extension enabled by default or turn it > off again? Well, I rather like in enabled by default. But this sort of question causes holy wars, so I will leave it entirely up to you ;-) > Cheers > > Tobi > > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:48:14
|
We should move this to its own thread... > How about: > > <modules> > <enabled-modules> > ... > </> > <disabled-modules> > ... > </> > </> > > This would let you copy/paste large blocks between enabled & disabled, > and would still facilitate transformations. Just an idea. Adam's > idea is probably better. I was thinking more along the lines of the folders extensions-available and extensions-enabled. All modules jars reside in extensions-available and you can simple link them into extensions-enabled as you require. And for those of you on Windows, dont worry there is a link tool available for Windows also. > > Joe > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Tobi K. <tob...@be...> - 2011-03-29 12:23:28
|
On Monday 28 March 2011 22:10:57 Adam Retter wrote: > You need to do both, and you also need to do a rebuild of the > extension modules before starting exist up again, from $EXIST_HOME you > can do ./build.sh extension-modules > Hi, i got it running now. Thanks again for the help. My current test results are : Junit: stable 100% and 1 fail in trunk (testRangeIndex3) which also seems to occur without enabling the extensions. XQTS: stable and trunk 99.3% (Minimal Conformance). If it is okay with you i would commit our changes to subversion. Should i use Joern´s credentials or can you provide another login for me? Last but not least: Should i leave the extension enabled by default or turn it off again? Cheers Tobi |
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 12:08:46
|
I think you are correct, good spot! ...but that code, I mean, yuck! On 29 March 2011 13:57, Chris Tomlinson <chr...@gm...> wrote: > Hi, > > In reading the code I notice that at line 176 of TriggerEvents.java the old style event name "remove" is mapped to EVENTS.MOVE_DOCUMENT rather than what would seem the more appropriate EVENTS.DELETE_DOCUMENT. Is this correct? > > Regards, > Chris > > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Chris T. <chr...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 11:57:43
|
Hi, In reading the code I notice that at line 176 of TriggerEvents.java the old style event name "remove" is mapped to EVENTS.MOVE_DOCUMENT rather than what would seem the more appropriate EVENTS.DELETE_DOCUMENT. Is this correct? Regards, Chris |
|
From: Joe W. <jo...@gm...> - 2011-03-29 11:29:49
|
>> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml.
>
> Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must
> be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both
> scenarios.....
How about:
<modules>
<enabled-modules>
...
</>
<disabled-modules>
...
</>
</>
This would let you copy/paste large blocks between enabled & disabled,
and would still facilitate transformations. Just an idea. Adam's
idea is probably better.
Joe
|
|
From: Adam R. <ad...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 09:36:02
|
Well I have some ideas about modules which I discussed with some people also at the pre-conference, but I am not sure I mentioned it to you guys. This should be a topic for discussion in one of our Friday developer conferences. On 29 March 2011 09:42, Dannes Wessels <da...@ex...> wrote: > Hi, > > On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...> wrote: >> >> > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute >> > instead >> > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring >> > time. >> >> +1 >> >> This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. >> > > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must > be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both > scenarios..... > > D. > > -- > eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org > Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > Enable your software for Intel(R) Active Management Technology to meet the > growing manageability and security demands of your customers. Businesses > are taking advantage of Intel(R) vPro (TM) technology - will your software > be a part of the solution? Download the Intel(R) Manageability Checker > today! http://p.sf.net/sfu/intel-dev2devmar > _______________________________________________ > Exist-development mailing list > Exi...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/exist-development > > -- Adam Retter eXist Developer { United Kingdom } ad...@ex... irc://irc.freenode.net/existdb |
|
From: Dannes W. <da...@ex...> - 2011-03-29 07:43:13
|
Hi, On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 10:05 PM, Joe Wicentowski <jo...@gm...> wrote: > > On preconference I heard interesting idea to use disable attribute > instead > > of putting modules description into comments. I can do it at refactoring > > time. > > +1 > > This would make it much easier to automate changes to conf.xml. > > Currently I enable/disable a whole block of modules in one go ; if it must be changed per item...... it is a lot of work. A change must match both scenarios..... D. -- eXist-db Native XML Database - http://exist-db.org Join us on linked-in: http://www.linkedin.com/groups?gid=35624 |
64 messages has been excluded from this view by a project administrator.
