Re: [Everydevel-opers] Two Points

[Nate O. <noo...@co...>]

Honestly, just go ahead and assign the copyright however you want -- if 
we need to xfer it from Blockstackers I can handle that, either by 
getting us to assign copyright to me personally or whatever.

IIRC under artistic the copyright is on the code AS the everything 
engine.  Someone else can take the code call it "my cool webframework" 
and have a copyright on that.

--n


paul_the_nomad wrote:
> On Friday 23 January 2009 17:08:01 Nathan Oostendorp wrote:
>   
>> copyright probably should just get moved to Blockstackers
>>
>> --n
>>     
>
>
> Hmmm, this makes it complicated.
>
> When, chromatic did his original changes for the OnLamp articles, he changed 
> the copyright notice to 2003.  But this doesn't make much sense because 
> Everything Development corporation didn't exist. My guess is that these 
> changes are actually copyright chromatic.
>
> My changes couldn't be assigned to Everything Development because a) it didn't 
> exist and b) I didn't agree to assign my copyright.
>
> The reason I'm asking is that if I host a fork at Savannah or gna.org they are 
> very particular about a clean copyright.
>
> Do you know how I can contact blockstackers to ask someone about it?
>
> Thanks
>
> Paul
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> This SF.net email is sponsored by:
> SourcForge Community
> SourceForge wants to tell your story.
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/sf-spreadtheword
> _______________________________________________
> Everydevel-opers mailing list
> Eve...@li...
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/everydevel-opers
>