From: naudts g. <nau...@ya...> - 2004-10-20 07:29:55
|
Hallo, I do agree. I want to remark that in RDFEngine however I do some experiments; I stated in the explanation that I want to be compatible with CWM (CWM sources should work) but that I do adde xperiments of my own. But, as said, I do agree that for Mozilla it is better to stick to commonly accepted syntax. Greetings, Guido. --- Alfred Döblin <alf...@ya...> wrote: > Háló, > > > With OWL this becomes: > > :person1 owl:differentFrom :person2. > > I think that is a far better approach; be it > standard > or not, I think we should stick to the commonly > accepted N3 syntax as much as possible, specially in > those cases in which there exist more than > reasonable > alternatives to express a certain concept. > > Cheers, > > Alfred > > > > > ___________________________________________________________ > Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - Jetzt mit 100MB Speicher > kostenlos - Hier anmelden: http://mail.yahoo.de > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.net email is sponsored by: IT Product Guide > on ITManagersJournal > Use IT products in your business? Tell us what you > think of them. Give us > Your Opinions, Get Free ThinkGeek Gift Certificates! > Click to find out more > http://productguide.itmanagersjournal.com/guidepromo.tmpl > _______________________________________________ > Eulermoz-developers mailing list > Eul...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eulermoz-developers > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Declare Yourself - Register online to vote today! http://vote.yahoo.com |