From: naudts g. <nau...@ya...> - 2004-08-27 15:51:44
|
Hallo, --- ant...@4c... wrote: > Hallo all. > > We've commited a new example at > http://cvs.sourceforge.net/viewcvs.py/eulermoz/eulermoz/tests/prolog/ > > It's basically the same test Joss did but : > a) Facts and rules are XML-RDF.(cities.rdf and > rules.rdf) > b) It's XUL based. > > Although nice it's not what we should achive. RDF is > loaded as XML into a > RDFDatasource an then serialized as a string (rules > are written as > literals) We could use RDF in XML syntax: SWRL(Semantic Web Rules Language) defines a syntax for rules; of course whether we use XML or N3 syntax, we should not do what the examples do: parse this XML or N3 syntax into a string and then again parse as prolog. The inference engine should use directly the result of XML or N3 parsing. Cheers, Guido > That transformation is a waste of resources and for > sure is not the idea. > Actually we are working on a N3 scanner to really > allow inference directly > against RDFDatasources. > > > Will keep you informed ;-) > > Cheers > Antonio > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This SF.Net email is sponsored by BEA Weblogic > Workshop > FREE Java Enterprise J2EE developer tools! > Get your free copy of BEA WebLogic Workshop 8.1 > today. > http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=5047&alloc_id=10808&op=click > _______________________________________________ > Eulermoz-developers mailing list > Eul...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/eulermoz-developers > _______________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Win 1 of 4,000 free domain names from Yahoo! Enter now. http://promotions.yahoo.com/goldrush |